Behrouz Javid Tehrani, only political prisoner of the famous students outburst at mid summer of 1999(18 Tir) who is still in jail, is in unknown condition since 3 weeks ago and there is no knowledge about his fate, so far.
He was insulted and beaten by one of the staff at the health center of Gohardasht prison on 27 April (2008) and then transferred to solitary confinement. The solitary confinement of this prison has no suitable and healthy condition and is a place for the sentenced prisoners to death.
Behrouz Javid Tehrani has been imprisoned since 8 years ago and during this time suffered most horrible physical and mental tortures.
On the other hand, Dr. Mostafa Alavi, the imprisoned researcher is on dangerous condition. He began his hunger strike near one month ago for protest to the inhuman treatment of persons in charged of the Gohardasht prison. After 30 days being on hunger strike, his pervious diseases are deteriorated now.
In reply to Dr. Alavi’s condition, Ali Mohamadi, the legal deputy of the prison told him “it is not important if you die here and we don’t care about it”.
This is worth of notification that these two political prisoners have been transferred to the Gohaedasht prison, recently. This prison has on of the worst healthy condition and transferring to this prison is an instrument for putting pressure on prisoners specially political prisoners.
one must not forget that one aspect of “security” cases is the image that they carry for the groups that advance such issues. Therefore, before fake charges take to the news-media and become public, those who have had a hand in arresting the students must be weakened. Otherwise, after the severe charges are made public, repeated and are tied to the image of the actors, even the intervention of the head of the judiciary (as history demonstrates) cannot be of much help to the detainees.
How can we tell the judiciary officials of Iran that according to law juveniles can stay alive and continue to live with appropriate and suitable punishment? How must one make this request from the judiciary a public and wide-spread demand and point out that killing a juvenile who has not wholeheartedly committed an act does not solve any of the real problems facing the country?
it is easy to predict that the success of student activists in imposing their will and demands on government officials at academic institutions, such as the Teachers Training college and Zanjan University (where the students boldly took the initiative into their own hands), would result in a backlash by extreme right-wing officials who would plan an “instructive” counter-attack against the student movement.Hopefully such a reaction will not come. But from an analytic perspective, one must not negate it altogether.
This is the reason that the moment imprisoned students step out of prison, it becomes clear to every one why they were put behind bars: for simply criticizing the president. It becomes instantly clear why they were subjected to interrogations and what questions were asked of them. These are the events that portray the image of this country. Students, social activists and journalists are certainly not on the list of those that dent this image. The publication of the arrest of students because of their criticism of the president brings forth a caricature image of Mahmud Ahmadinejad which does not match the claims that he made at Columbia University or the image that the regime strives to present about its standing.
There are at least 70 young people on death row who at the time of their arrest were under the age of 16. In the past 12 months, Iranian organisations claim that 80 feminists have been arrested and 20 of them have been sentenced from three to five years in jail. A total of 54 journalists have ended up in prison, several were released without trial after serving jail time, while others remain behind bars. In the past 12 months, 34 newspapers and magazines, among them the feminist magazine Zanan, have been shut down.
